I\'ve been playing around with arrays of generic classes with different types. It\'s easiest to explain my problem with some sample code:
// Obviously a very
There is a way - sort of - to do what you want - kind of. There is a way, with protocols, to eliminate the type restriction and still get the result that you want, kind of, but it isn't always pretty. Here is what I came up with as a protocol in your situation:
protocol MyProtocol {
func getValue() -> Self
}
extension Int: MyProtocol {
func getValue() -> Int {
return self
}
}
extension Double: MyProtocol {
func getValue() -> Double {
return self
}
}
Note that the value property that you originally put in your protocol declaration has been changed to a method that returns the object.
That's not very interesting.
But now, because you've gotten rid of the value property in the protocol, MyProtocol can be used as a type, not just as a type constraint. Your Container class doesn't even need to be generic anymore. You can declare it like this:
class Container {
var values: [MyProtocol]
init(_ values: MyProtocol...) {
self.values = values
}
func myMethod() -> [MyProtocol] {
return values
}
}
And because Container is no longer generic, you can create an Array of Containers and iterate through them, printing the results of the myMethod() method:
var containers = [Container]()
containers.append(Container(1, 4, 6, 2, 6))
containers.append(Container(1.2, 3.5))
for container in containers {
println(container.myMethod())
}
// Output: [1, 4, 6, 2, 6]
// [1.2, 3.5]
The trick is to construct a protocol that only includes generic functions and places no other requirements on a conforming type. If you can get away with doing that, then you can use the protocol as a type, and not just as a type constraint.
And as a bonus (if you want to call it that), your array of MyProtocol values can even mix different types that conform to MyProtocol. So if you give String a MyProtocol extension like this:
extension String: MyProtocol {
func getValue() -> String {
return self
}
}
You can actually initialize a Container with mixed types:
let container = Container(1, 4.2, "no kidding, this works")
[Warning - I am testing this in one of the online playgrounds. I haven't been able to test it in Xcode yet...]
Edit:
If you still want Container to be generic and only hold one type of object, you can accomplish that by making it conform to its own protocol:
protocol ContainerProtocol {
func myMethod() -> [MyProtocol]
}
class Container: ContainerProtocol {
var values: [T] = []
init(_ values: T...) {
self.values = values
}
func myMethod() -> [MyProtocol] {
return values.map { $0 as MyProtocol }
}
}
Now you can still have an array of [ContainerProtocol] objects and iterate through them invoking myMethod():
let containers: [ContainerProtocol] = [Container(5, 3, 7), Container(1.2, 4,5)]
for container in containers {
println(container.myMethod())
}
Maybe that still doesn't work for you, but now Container is restricted to a single type, and yet you can still iterate through an array of ContainterProtocol objects.