I need information about any standard python package which can be used for \"longest prefix match\" on URLs. I have gone through the two standard packages http://packages.py
suffixtree vs. pytrie vs. trie vs. datrie vs. startswith -functionsThe recorded time is a minimum time among 3 repetitions of 1000 searches. A trie construction time is included and spread among all searches. The search is performed on collections of hostnames from 1 to 1000000 items.
Three types of a search string:
non_existent_key - there is no match for the stringrare_key - around 20 in a millionfrequent_key - number of occurrences is comparable to the collection size| function | memory, | ratio |
| | GiB | |
|-------------+---------+-------|
| suffix_tree | 0.853 | 1.0 |
| pytrie | 3.383 | 4.0 |
| trie | 3.803 | 4.5 |
| datrie | 0.194 | 0.2 |
| startswith | 0.069 | 0.1 |
#+TBLFM: $3=$2/@3$2;%.1f
To reproduce the results, run the trie benchmark code.
rare_key/nonexistent_key case
if number of urls is less than 10000 then datrie is the fastest, for
N>10000 - suffixtree is faster, startwith is significally slower on average.

axes:

frequent_key
Upto N=100000 datrie is the fastest (for a million urls the time is
dominated by the trie construction time).
The most time is taken by finding the longest match among found matches. So all functions behave similar as expected.

startswith - time performance is independent from type of key.
trie and pytrie behave similar to each other.
datrie - the fastest, decent memory consumption
startswith is even more at disadvantage here because other approaches are not penalized by the time it takes to build a trie.
datrie, pytrie, trie - almost O(1) (constant time) for rare/non_existent key


Fitting (approximating) polynoms of known functions for comparison (same log/log scale as in figures):
| Fitting polynom | Function |
|------------------------------+-------------------|
| 0.15 log2(N) + 1.583 | log2(N) |
| 0.30 log2(N) + 3.167 | log2(N)*log2(N) |
| 0.50 log2(N) + 1.111e-15 | sqrt(N) |
| 0.80 log2(N) + 7.943e-16 | N**0.8 |
| 1.00 log2(N) + 2.223e-15 | N |
| 2.00 log2(N) + 4.446e-15 | N*N |