OpenSSL using EVP vs. algorithm API for symmetric crypto

Question

Hi i have installed openssl on my linux machine and going through the header files and documentation (which is highly insufficint :( ).

i am trying to build a projec

Answer 1

Using the EVP API has the advantage that you can use the same API for all the symmetric ciphers that OpenSSL supports, in a generic way. This makes it way easier to replace the algorithm used, or make the algorithm user-configurable at a later stage. Most of the code you write is not specific to the encryption algorithm you selected.

Here's a simple example for encryption with AES-256 in CBC mode:

#include 
#include 

int main()
{
    EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx;
    unsigned char key[32] = {0};
    unsigned char iv[16] = {0};
    unsigned char in[16] = {0};
    unsigned char out[32]; /* at least one block longer than in[] */
    int outlen1, outlen2;

    EVP_EncryptInit(&ctx, EVP_aes_256_cbc(), key, iv);
    EVP_EncryptUpdate(&ctx, out, &outlen1, in, sizeof(in));
    EVP_EncryptFinal(&ctx, out + outlen1, &outlen2);

    printf("ciphertext length: %d\n", outlen1 + outlen2);

    return 0;
}

For simplicity, I omitted error handling.

IMO one of the most important pieces of documentation on OpenSSL is Network Security with OpenSSL by Viega/Messier/Chandra. It is from 2002 (0.9.7), so does not cover changes to OpenSSL during the last 10 years, but it is IMO still a less painful way to learn OpenSSL than by using only the manual pages.