I am reading some Java text and the text says that we can only apply public or default access modifier for class and interface. Therefore, it is a
private means "only visible within the enclosing class".
protected means "only visible within the enclosing class and any subclasses, and also anywhere in the enclosing class's package".
private, therefore, has no meaning when applied to a top-level class; the same goes for the first part of the definition of protected. The second part of protected could apply, but it is covered by the default (package-protected) modifier, so protected is part meaningless and part redundant.
Both private and protected can be (and frequently are) applied to nested classes and interfaces, just never top-level classes and interfaces.