Java Runtime Performance Vs Native C / C++ Code?

Question

I\'ve become more and more comfortable programming in Java than with C++ or C. I am hoping to get a sense of the performance hit incurred using a JVM interpreter, as oppose

Answer 1

A lot of people underestimate the performance of java. I was once curious about this as well and wrote a simple program in java and then an equivalent in c (not much more than doing some operation with a for loop and a massive array). I don't recall exact figures, but I do know that java beat out c when the c program was not compiled with any optimization flags (under gcc). As expected, c pulled ahead when I finally compiled it with aggressive optimization. To be honest, it wasn't a scientific experiment by any means, but it did give me a baseline of knowing just where java stood.

Of course, java probably falls further behind when you start doing things that require system calls. Though, I have seen 100MB/s read performance with disks and network with java programs running on modest hardware. Not sure what that says exactly, but it does indicate to me that it's good enough for pretty much anything I'll need it for.

As for threads, if your java program creates 2 threads, then you have 2 real threads.