I understand that the String class\' hashCode() method is not guarantied to generate unique hash codes for distinct String-s. I see a lot of usage of putting Strin
I direct you to the answer here. While it is not a bad idea to use strings( @CPerkins explained why, perfectly), storing the values in a hashmap with integer keys is better, since it is generally quicker (although unnoticeably) and has lower chance (actually, no chance) of collisions.
See this chart of collisions using 216553 keys in each case, (stolen from this post, reformatted for our discussion)
Hash Lowercase Random UUID Numbers ============= ============= =========== ============== Murmur 145 ns 259 ns 92 ns 6 collis 5 collis 0 collis FNV-1a 152 ns 504 ns 86 ns 4 collis 4 collis 0 collis FNV-1 184 ns 730 ns 92 ns 1 collis 5 collis 0 collis* DBJ2a 158 ns 443 ns 91 ns 5 collis 6 collis 0 collis*** DJB2 156 ns 437 ns 93 ns 7 collis 6 collis 0 collis*** SDBM 148 ns 484 ns 90 ns 4 collis 6 collis 0 collis** CRC32 250 ns 946 ns 130 ns 2 collis 0 collis 0 collis Avg Time per key 0.8ps 2.5ps 0.44ps Collisions (%) 0.002% 0.002% 0%
Of course, the number of integers is limited to 2^32, where as there is no limit to the number of strings (and there is no theoretical limit to the amount of keys that can be stored in a HashMap
). If you use a long
(or even a float
), collisions will be inevitable, and therefore no "better" than a string. However, even despite hash collisions, put()
and get()
will always put/get the correct key-value pair (See edit below).
In the end, it really doesn't matter, so use whatever is more convenient. But if convenience makes no difference, and you do not intend to have more than 2^32 entries, I suggest you use ints
as keys.
EDIT
While the above is definitely true, NEVER use "StringKey".hashCode() to generate a key in place of the original String
key for performance reasons- 2 different strings can have the same hashCode, causing overwriting on your put()
method. Java's implementation of HashMap
is smart enough to handle strings (any type of key, actually) with the same hashcode automatically, so it is wise to let Java handle these things for you.