I\'m trying to profile the time it takes to compute a sqrt using the following simple C code, where readTSC() is a function to read the CPU\'s cycle counter.
It's using the library sqrt
function for error handling. See glibc's documentation: 20.5.4 Error Reporting by Mathematical Functions: math functions set errno
for compatibility with systems that don't have IEEE754 exception flags. Related: glibc's math_error(7) man page.
As an optimization, it first tries to perform the square root by the inlined sqrtsd
instruction, then checks the result against itself using the ucomisd
instruction which sets the flags as follows:
CASE (RESULT) OF UNORDERED: ZF,PF,CF 111; GREATER_THAN: ZF,PF,CF 000; LESS_THAN: ZF,PF,CF 001; EQUAL: ZF,PF,CF 100; ESAC;
In particular, comparing a QNaN
to itself will return UNORDERED
, which is what you will get if you try to take the square root of a negative number. This is covered by the jp
branch. The je
check is just paranoia, checking for exact equality.
Also note that gcc has a -fno-math-errno option which will sacrifice this error handling for speed. This option is part of -ffast-math
, but can be used on its own without enabling any result-changing optimizations.
sqrtsd
on its own correctly produces NaN for negative and NaN inputs, and sets the IEEE754 Invalid flag. The check and branch is only to preserve the errno
-setting semantics which most code doesn't rely on.
-fno-math-errno
is the default on Darwin (OS X), where the math library never sets errno
, so functions can be inlined without this check.