I want to search div id in an html doc with certain pattern. I want to match this pattern in regex:
foo_([[:digit:]]{1.8})
using xpath. W
How about this (updated):
XPath 1.0:
"//div[substring-before(@id, '_') = 'foo'
and substring-after(@id, '_') >= 0
and substring-after(@id, '_') <= 99999999]"
Edit #2: The OP made a change to the question. The following, even more reduced XPath 1.0 expression works for me:
"//div[substring(@id, 1, 13) = 'post_message_'
and substring(@id, 14) >= 0
and substring(@id, 14) <= 99999999]"
XPath 2.0 has a convenient matches() function:
"//div[matches(@id, '^foo_\d{1,8}$')]"
Apart from the better portability, I would expect the numerical expression (XPath 1.0 style) to perform better than the regex test, though this would only become noticeable when processing large data sets.
Original version of the answer:
"//div[substring-before(@id, '_') = 'foo'
and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) = substring-after(@id, '_')
and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) >= 0
and number(substring-after(@id, '_')) <= 99999999]"
The use of the number() function is unnecessary, because the mathematical comparison operators coerce their arguments to numbers implicitly, any non-numbers will become NaN and the greater than/less than tests will fail.
I also removed the encoding of the angle brackets, since this is an XML requirement, not an XPath requirement.