Can “git pull --all” update all my local branches?

Question

I often have at least 3 remote branches: master, staging and production. I have 3 local branches that track those remote branches.

Updating all my local branches is

Answer 1

There are a lot of answers here but none that use git-fetch to update the local ref directly, which is a lot simpler than checking out branches, and safer than git-update-ref.

Here we use git-fetch to update non-current branches and git pull --ff-only for the current branch. It:

• Doesn't require checking out branches
• Updates branches only if they can be fast-forwarded
• Will report when it can't fast-forward

and here it is:

#!/bin/bash
currentbranchref="$(git symbolic-ref HEAD 2>&-)"
git branch -r | grep -v ' -> ' | while read remotebranch
do
    # Split / into remote and branchref parts
    remote="${remotebranch%%/*}"
    branchref="refs/heads/${remotebranch#*/}"

    if [ "$branchref" == "$currentbranchref" ]
    then
        echo "Updating current branch $branchref from $remote..."
        git pull --ff-only
    else
        echo "Updating non-current ref $branchref from $remote..."
        git fetch "$remote" "$branchref:$branchref"
    fi
done

From the manpage for git-fetch:

   
       The format of a  parameter is an optional plus +, followed by the source ref ,
       followed by a colon :, followed by the destination ref .

       The remote ref that matches  is fetched, and if  is not empty string, the local ref
       that matches it is fast-forwarded using . If the optional plus + is used, the local ref is
       updated even if it does not result in a fast-forward update.

By specifying git fetch : (without any +) we get a fetch that updates the local ref only when it can be fast-forwarded.

Note: this assumes the local and remote branches are named the same (and that you want to track all branches), it should really use information about which local branches you have and what they are set up to track.