What's the -practical- difference between a Bare and non-Bare repository?

Question

I\'ve been reading about the bare and non-bare / default repositores in Git. I haven\'t been able to understand quite well (theoretically) about the differences between them

Answer 1

I'm certainly not a Git "expert". I have used TortoiseGit for a while, and wondered what it was talking about when it asked me if I wanted to make a "bare" repo whenever I created one. I was reading this tutorial: https://www.atlassian.com/git/tutorials/setting-up-a-repository/git-init and it addresses the issue, but I still was not quite understanding the concept. This one helped a lot: http://bitflop.com/tutorials/git-bare-vs-non-bare-repositories.html. Now, the first one makes sense too!

According to these sources, in a nutshell a "bare" repo is used on a server where you want to setup a distribution point. It's not intented for use on your local machine. You generally push commits from your local machine to a bare repo on a remote server, and you and/or others pull from that bare repo to your local machine. So your GitHub, Assembla, etc. remote storage / distribution repo is an example where a "bare" repo is created. You would make one yourself if you were setting up your own analogous "sharing center".