I have been looking for an answer for this, but have only found answers for segues.
I have viewController1
with a button that segues to viewContr
There are two common patterns, both of which eliminate the need for viewController2 to know explicitly about viewController1 (which is great for maintainability):
Create a delegate protocol for your for viewController2 and set viewController1 as the delegate. Whenever you want to send data back to viewController1, have viewController2 send the "delegate" the data
Setup a closure as a property that allows passing the data. viewController1 would implement that closure on viewController2 when displaying viewController2. Whenever viewController2 has data to pass back, it would call the closure. I feel that this method is more "swift" like.
Here is some example code for #2:
class ViewController2 : UIViewController {
var onDataAvailable : ((data: String) -> ())?
func sendData(data: String) {
// Whenever you want to send data back to viewController1, check
// if the closure is implemented and then call it if it is
self.onDataAvailable?(data: data)
}
}
class ViewController1 : UIViewController {
func doSomethingWithData(data: String) {
// Do something with data
}
override func prepareForSegue(segue: UIStoryboardSegue!, sender: AnyObject!) {
// When preparing for the segue, have viewController1 provide a closure for
// onDataAvailable
if let viewController = segue.destinationViewController as? ViewController2 {
viewController.onDataAvailable = {[weak self]
(data) in
if let weakSelf = self {
weakSelf.doSomethingWithData(data)
}
}
}
}
}