I have a class whose instances need to format output as instructed by the user. There\'s a default format, which can be overridden. I implemented it like this:
If you use the dill module, either of your two approaches will just "work" as is. dill can pickle lambda as well as instances of classes and also class methods.
No need to pollute the namespace and break encapsulation, as you said you didn't want to do… but the other answer does.
dill is basically ten years or so worth of finding the right copy_reg function that registers how to serialize the majority of objects in standard python. Nothing special or tricky, it just takes time. So why doesn't pickle do this for us? Why does pickle have this restriction?
Well, if you look at the pickle docs, the answer is there:
https://docs.python.org/2/library/pickle.html#what-can-be-pickled-and-unpickled
Basically: Functions and classes are pickled by reference.
This means pickle does not work on objects defined in __main__, and it also doesn't work on many dynamically modified objects. dill registers __main__ as a module, so it has a valid namespace. dill also given you the option to not pickle by reference, so you can serialize dynamically modified objects… and class instances, class methods (bound and unbound), and so on.