Are there any performance issues of using \"IN\" keyword in SQL statements in places where we can use JOIN?
SELECT xxx
FROM xxx
WHERE ID IN (SELECT Id FROM x
No, it's OK to use.
You can write the query above using IN, EXISTS in all RDBMS, some also support INTERSECT.
Semantically this is a semi-join which "give me rows from table A where I have a at least one match in tableB". An INNER JOIN is "give me all matching rows"
So if TableA has 3 rows and TableB has 5 rows that match:
This is why IN and EXISTS are pushed by me and the other SQL types here: a JOIN is wrong, requires DISTINCT and will be slower.
EXISTS support multiple column JOINs, IN doesn't in SQL Server (it does in others).