What is the memory overhead of having an empty vector vs having a pointer to a vector?
Option A:
std::vector v;
Option B
As for the question as asked: It depends on the implementation. With MSVC 7.1 this:
std:: cout << sizeof(std::vector) << std::endl;
gives me 16 (bytes). (3 pointers: begin, end, and end of capacity, plus an allocator)
However it should be noted that the pointer-to-vector gives it a larger overhead: