What can `__init__` do that `__new__` cannot?

前端 未结 3 2037
星月不相逢
星月不相逢 2020-12-06 04:26

In Python, __new__ is used to initialize immutable types and __init__ typically initializes mutable types. If __init__ were removed f

3条回答
  •  渐次进展
    2020-12-06 05:00

    Note about difference between __new__ and __init__

    Before explaining missing functionality let's get back to definition of __new__ and __init__:

    __new__ is the first step of instance creation. It's called first, and is responsible for returning a new instance of your class.

    However, __init__ doesn't return anything; it's only responsible for initializing the instance after it's been created.

    Consequences of replacing __init__ with __new__

    Mainly you would lose out on flexibility. You would get a lot of semantics headaches and loose separation of initializatin and construction (by joining __new__ andinit we are to joining construction and initialization into one step...). Let's take a look on snippet below:

    class A(object):
        some_property = 'some_value'
    
        def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
            obj = object.__new__(cls, *args, **kwargs)
            obj.some_property = cls.some_property
            return obj
    
    
    class B(A):
        some_property = 2
    
        def __new__(cls, *args, **kwargs):
            obj = super(B, cls).__new__(cls)
            return obj
    

    Consequences of moving __init__ actions into __new__:

    1. Initialize B before A: When you are using __new__ method instead of __init__ your first step of creating new instance of B is calling A.__new__ as side effect you cannot initialize B before A is initialized ( access and assign some properties to new B instance). Using of __init__ gives you such flexability.

    2. Loose control on initializing order: let's imagine that you have B_N inherited from two classes (A_N1, A_N2), now you would miss controlling of order of initializing new instance of B_N(what is the order you are going to initialize instances ? it could be matter... what is weird.)

    3. Properties and methods mess: you would miss access to A.some_property (cls would be equal to B while instantiating new instance of B. However directly accessing of A.some_property is possible, but my guess it's at least weird to access properties within class throught class name and not by using classmethods).

    4. You cannot re-initialize an existed instance without creating new one or implementation special logic for this ( thanks to @platinhom for idea )

    What can __init__ do that __new__ cannot?

    There are no actions that cannot be done in __new__ and can in __init__, because actions that __init__ performs is a subset of the actions that can be performed by __new__.

    An interesting moment from Python Docs, Pickling and unpickling normal class instances#object.getinitargs regarding when __init__ could be usefull:

    When a pickled class instance is unpickled, its init() method is normally not invoked.

提交回复
热议问题