ThreadPoolExecutor with corePoolSize 0 should not execute tasks until task queue is full

后端 未结 3 1004
栀梦
栀梦 2020-12-06 02:53

I was going through Java Concurrency In Practice and got stuck at the 8.3.1 Thread creation and teardown topic. The following footnote warn

3条回答
  •  囚心锁ツ
    2020-12-06 03:07

    Seems like it was a bug with older java versions but it doesn't exist now in Java 1.8.

    According to the Java 1.8 documentation from ThreadPoolExecutor.execute():

         /*
         * Proceed in 3 steps:
         *
         * 1. If fewer than corePoolSize threads are running, try to
         * start a new thread with the given command as its first
         * task.  The call to addWorker atomically checks runState and
         * workerCount, and so prevents false alarms that would add
         * threads when it shouldn't, by returning false.
         *
         * 2. If a task can be successfully queued, then we still need
         * to double-check whether we should have added a thread
         * (because existing ones died since last checking) or that
         * the pool shut down since entry into this method. So we
         * recheck state and if necessary roll back the enqueuing if
         * stopped, or start a new thread if there are none.
         * ....
         */
    

    In the second point, there is a recheck after adding a worker to the queue that if instead of queuing the task, a new thread can be started, than rollback the enqueuing and start a new thread.

    This is what is happening. During first check the task is queued but during recheck, a new thread is started which executes your task.

提交回复
热议问题