According to w3c and tags are optional, so the following table is perfectly valid.
10条回答 隐瞒了意图╮ (楼主) 2020-12-05 23:32 This is valid HTML but invalid XHTML. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with it. If you look at the source for Google's privacy policy (or any of their other pages), you'll find some much terser HTML. It does mean that your page will not be usable by an XML parser. 0 讨论(0) 查看其它10个回答 发布评论: 提交评论 加载中... 验证码 看不清? 提交回复 热议问题
This is valid HTML but invalid XHTML. There's nothing intrinsically wrong with it.
If you look at the source for Google's privacy policy (or any of their other pages), you'll find some much terser HTML.
It does mean that your page will not be usable by an XML parser.
加载中...