Difference between global non-throwing ::operator new and std::malloc

Question

C++ has several functions to acquire dynamic storage, most of which differ in some fundamental way. Several more are usually added by the OS.

Two of these are of spe

Answer 1

The main differences, aside from syntax and free vs. delete, are

1. you can portably replace ::operator new;
2. malloc comes with realloc, for which new has no equivalent;
3. new has the concept of a new_handler, for which there is no malloc equivalent.

(Replacing malloc opens up a can of worms. It can be done, but not portably, because it requires knowledge of the linker.)