With the original way to define controllers, accessing the parent\'s scope was fairly trivial, since the child scope prototypically inherits from its parent
After researching, I came to the following realization:
Controller-As approach is NOT a substitute for using
$scope. Both have their place, and can/should be used together judiciously.
$scope does exactly what the name implies: i.e. it defines ViewModel properties on the $scope. This works best for sharing scope with nested controllers that can use the $scope to drive their own logic or to change it.Here's an example:
var app = angular.module('myApp', []);
// Then the controllers could choose whether they want to modify the inherited scope or not:
app.controller("ParentCtrl", function($scope) {
this.prop1 = {
v: "prop1 from ParentCtrl"
};
$scope.prop1 = {
v: "defined on the scope by ParentCtrl"
};
})
.controller("Child1Ctrl", function($scope) {})
.controller("Child2Ctrl", function($scope) {
// here, I don't know about the "pc" alias
this.myProp = $scope.prop1.v + ", and changed by Child2Ctrl";
});
I know about the "pc" alias: {{pc.prop1.v}}
I only care about my own ViewModel: {{ch2.myProp}}