How to cast List<object> to List

Answer 1

LINQ, as implemented through the extension methods within the Enumerable class, relies on deferred execution:

Methods that are used in a query that returns a sequence of values do not consume the target data until the query object is enumerated. This is known as deferred execution.

Cast does not create a new list immediately, but rather stores all the information that is required to perform the action. The list would only get enumerated when required (for example, through a foreach statement).

In your case, if you simply intend to iterate over the sequence, you should consider sticking to the IEnumerable interface, which is the declared return type of Cast:

IEnumerable second = first.Cast();
foreach (SomethingElse se in second)
{
    // ...
}

This is efficient, since it only performs the cast as each item is iterated.

If you’re convinced you want a new list to be created immediately, use ToList:

List second = first.Cast().ToList();

Edit: Replying to point posted in comment:

It depends on what you mean by “a list that can be modified”. There are several LINQ query operators that will allow you to alter the definition of your query further. For example, if you want to remove all SomethingElse elements whose IsDeleted property is true, you can use the Where operator:

IEnumerable second = first.Cast();
second = second.Where(element => !element.IsDeleted);

If you want to add a sequence of new elements, you can use the Concat operator:

second = second.Concat(anotherCollectionOfSomethingElse);

If you want to sort your sequence in ascending order of ID, use the OrderBy operator:

second = second.OrderBy(element => element.ID);

Each time, we’re applying a query operator over the former definition of our query, and assigning the new (composite) query to our second variable. LINQ would store all your operators in the query definition. Then, when the sequence is actually enumerated (for example, through a foreach or ToList), it would give you the composite result of your sequence, with all the query operators applied in order.

As with all cases of deferred execution / lazy evaluation, be careful not to go overboard with this. If, for example, you’re going to apply a Where operator which will reduce the size of your sequence drastically, it might make sense to execute the query eagerly and store the enumerated list instead.