What's the point of map in Haskell, when there is fmap?

Question

Everywhere I\'ve tried using map, fmap has worked as well. Why did the creators of Haskell feel the need for a map function? Couldn\'t

Answer 1

Quoting from the Functor documentation at https://wiki.haskell.org/Typeclassopedia#Functor

You might ask why we need a separate map function. Why not just do away with the current list-only map function, and rename fmap to map instead? Well, that’s a good question. The usual argument is that someone just learning Haskell, when using map incorrectly, would much rather see an error about lists than about Functor.