const auto std::initializer_list difference between Clang and GCC

后端 未结 2 1535
闹比i
闹比i 2020-12-04 01:23

I am trying to understand what the correct behavior of C++11 should be when combining initialization lists and const auto. I am getting different behavior betwe

2条回答
  •  隐瞒了意图╮
    2020-12-04 02:06

    GCC bug. [dcl.spec.auto]/p7 (quoting N4527):

    When a variable declared using a placeholder type is initialized, [...] the deduced return type or variable type is determined from the type of its initializer. [...] Otherwise, let T be the declared type of the variable [...]. If the placeholder is the auto type-specifier, the deduced type is determined using the rules for template argument deduction. If the initialization is direct-list-initialization [...]. [...] Otherwise, obtain P from T by replacing the occurrences of auto with either a new invented type template parameter U or, if the initialization is copy-list-initialization, with std::initializer_list. Deduce a value for U using the rules of template argument deduction from a function call (14.8.2.1), where P is a function template parameter type and the corresponding argument is the initializer [...]. If the deduction fails, the declaration is ill-formed. Otherwise, the type deduced for the variable or return type is obtained by substituting the deduced U into P.

    Thus, in const auto l2 = { 1, 2, 3 };, deduction is performed as if for the function template

    template void meow(const std::initializer_list);
    

    given the call meow({1, 2, 3}).

    Now consider the const-less case auto l3 = { 1, 2, 3 }; (which GCC correctly deduces as std::initializer_list). Deduction in this case is performed as if for the function template

    template void purr(std::initializer_list);
    

    given the call purr({1, 2, 3}).

    Since top-level cv-qualification of function parameters are ignored, it should be obvious that the two deduction should yield the same type.


    [temp.deduct.call]/p1:

    Template argument deduction is done by comparing each function template parameter type (call it P) with the type of the corresponding argument of the call (call it A) as described below. If P is a dependent type, removing references and cv-qualifiers from P gives std::initializer_list [...] for some P' [...] and the argument is a non-empty initializer list (8.5.4), then deduction is performed instead for each element of the initializer list, taking P' as a function template parameter type and the initializer element as its argument.

    Deducing P' (which is U) against 1, 2, or 3, all literals of type int, obviously yields int.

提交回复
热议问题