I have the following code to do this, but how can I do it better? Right now I think it\'s better than nested loops, but it starts to get Perl-one-linerish when you have a ge
Here's code for a general date range function, similar to Ber's answer, but more flexible:
def count_timedelta(delta, step, seconds_in_interval):
"""Helper function for iterate. Finds the number of intervals in the timedelta."""
return int(delta.total_seconds() / (seconds_in_interval * step))
def range_dt(start, end, step=1, interval='day'):
"""Iterate over datetimes or dates, similar to builtin range."""
intervals = functools.partial(count_timedelta, (end - start), step)
if interval == 'week':
for i in range(intervals(3600 * 24 * 7)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(weeks=i) * step
elif interval == 'day':
for i in range(intervals(3600 * 24)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(days=i) * step
elif interval == 'hour':
for i in range(intervals(3600)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(hours=i) * step
elif interval == 'minute':
for i in range(intervals(60)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(minutes=i) * step
elif interval == 'second':
for i in range(intervals(1)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(seconds=i) * step
elif interval == 'millisecond':
for i in range(intervals(1 / 1000)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(milliseconds=i) * step
elif interval == 'microsecond':
for i in range(intervals(1e-6)):
yield start + datetime.timedelta(microseconds=i) * step
else:
raise AttributeError("Interval must be 'week', 'day', 'hour' 'second', \
'microsecond' or 'millisecond'.")