In .NET 4.5 / C# 5, IReadOnlyCollection is declared with a Count property:
public interface IReadOnlyCollection
When I first read your question I thought "Hey, he's right! That would make the most sense." But the point of an interface is to describe a contract - A description of behavior. If your class implements IReadOnlyCollection, it should be read-only. Collection isn't. So for a Collection to implement an interface that implied read-only could lead to some pretty nasty problems. Consumers of an IReadOnlyCollection are going to make certain assumptions about that underlying collection - like iterating over it is safe becuase no one can be modifying it, etc. etc. If it was structured as you suggest that might not be true!