Before Java 8 when we split on empty string like
String[] tokens = \"abc\".split(\"\");
split mechanism would split in pl
The behavior of String.split
(which calls Pattern.split
) changes between Java 7 and Java 8.
Comparing between the documentation of Pattern.split
in Java 7 and Java 8, we observe the following clause being added:
When there is a positive-width match at the beginning of the input sequence then an empty leading substring is included at the beginning of the resulting array. A zero-width match at the beginning however never produces such empty leading substring.
The same clause is also added to String.split
in Java 8, compared to Java 7.
Let us compare the code of Pattern.split
of the reference implemetation in Java 7 and Java 8. The code is retrieved from grepcode, for version 7u40-b43 and 8-b132.
public String[] split(CharSequence input, int limit) {
int index = 0;
boolean matchLimited = limit > 0;
ArrayList matchList = new ArrayList<>();
Matcher m = matcher(input);
// Add segments before each match found
while(m.find()) {
if (!matchLimited || matchList.size() < limit - 1) {
String match = input.subSequence(index, m.start()).toString();
matchList.add(match);
index = m.end();
} else if (matchList.size() == limit - 1) { // last one
String match = input.subSequence(index,
input.length()).toString();
matchList.add(match);
index = m.end();
}
}
// If no match was found, return this
if (index == 0)
return new String[] {input.toString()};
// Add remaining segment
if (!matchLimited || matchList.size() < limit)
matchList.add(input.subSequence(index, input.length()).toString());
// Construct result
int resultSize = matchList.size();
if (limit == 0)
while (resultSize > 0 && matchList.get(resultSize-1).equals(""))
resultSize--;
String[] result = new String[resultSize];
return matchList.subList(0, resultSize).toArray(result);
}
public String[] split(CharSequence input, int limit) {
int index = 0;
boolean matchLimited = limit > 0;
ArrayList matchList = new ArrayList<>();
Matcher m = matcher(input);
// Add segments before each match found
while(m.find()) {
if (!matchLimited || matchList.size() < limit - 1) {
if (index == 0 && index == m.start() && m.start() == m.end()) {
// no empty leading substring included for zero-width match
// at the beginning of the input char sequence.
continue;
}
String match = input.subSequence(index, m.start()).toString();
matchList.add(match);
index = m.end();
} else if (matchList.size() == limit - 1) { // last one
String match = input.subSequence(index,
input.length()).toString();
matchList.add(match);
index = m.end();
}
}
// If no match was found, return this
if (index == 0)
return new String[] {input.toString()};
// Add remaining segment
if (!matchLimited || matchList.size() < limit)
matchList.add(input.subSequence(index, input.length()).toString());
// Construct result
int resultSize = matchList.size();
if (limit == 0)
while (resultSize > 0 && matchList.get(resultSize-1).equals(""))
resultSize--;
String[] result = new String[resultSize];
return matchList.subList(0, resultSize).toArray(result);
}
The addition of the following code in Java 8 excludes the zero-length match at the beginning of the input string, which explains the behavior above.
if (index == 0 && index == m.start() && m.start() == m.end()) {
// no empty leading substring included for zero-width match
// at the beginning of the input char sequence.
continue;
}
To make split
behaves consistently across versions and compatible with the behavior in Java 8:
(?!\A)
at the end of the regex and wrap the original regex in non-capturing group (?:...)
(if necessary).(?!\A)
checks that the string does not end at the beginning of the string, which implies that the match is an empty match at the beginning of the string.
There is no general solution to make split
backward-compatible with Java 7 and prior, short of replacing all instance of split
to point to your own custom implementation.