I am a newbee to Go programming. I have read in go programming book that slice consists of three things: a pointer to an array, length and capacity.
I am getting con
nil and empty slices (with 0 capacity) are not the same, but their observable behavior is the same. By this I mean:
for range over them (will be 0 iterations)See this simple example (a nil slice and 2 non-nil empty slices):
var s1 []int // nil slice
s2 := []int{} // non-nil, empty slice
s3 := make([]int, 0) // non-nil, empty slice
fmt.Println("s1", len(s1), cap(s1), s1 == nil, s1[:], s1[:] == nil)
fmt.Println("s2", len(s2), cap(s2), s2 == nil, s2[:], s2[:] == nil)
fmt.Println("s3", len(s3), cap(s3), s3 == nil, s3[:], s3[:] == nil)
for range s1 {}
for range s2 {}
for range s3 {}
Output (try it on the Go Playground):
s1 0 0 true [] true
s2 0 0 false [] false
s3 0 0 false [] false
(Note that slicing a nil slice results in a nil slice, slicing a non-nil slice results in a non-nil slice.)
You can only tell the difference by comparing the slice value to the predeclared identifier nil, they behave the same in every other aspect.
To tell if a slice is empty, simply compare its length to 0: len(s) == 0. It doesn't matter if it's the nil slice or a non-nil slice, it also doesn't matter if it has a positive capacity; if it has no elements, it's empty.
s := make([]int, 0, 100)
fmt.Println("Empty:", len(s) == 0, ", but capacity:", cap(s))
Prints (try it on the Go Playground):
Empty: true , but capacity: 100
A slice value is represented by a struct defined in reflect.SliceHeader:
type SliceHeader struct {
Data uintptr
Len int
Cap int
}
In case of a nil slice, this struct will have its zero value which is all its fields will be their zero value, that is: 0.
Having a non-nil slice with both capacity and length equal to 0, Len and Cap fields will most certainly be 0, but the Data pointer may not be. It will not be, that is what differentiates it from the nil slice. It will point to a zero-sized underlying array.
Note that the Go spec allows for values of different types having 0 size to have the same memory address. Spec: System considerations: Size and alignment guarantees:
A struct or array type has size zero if it contains no fields (or elements, respectively) that have a size greater than zero. Two distinct zero-size variables may have the same address in memory.
Let's check this. For this we call the help of the unsafe package, and "obtain" the reflect.SliceHeader struct "view" of our slice values:
var s1 []int
s2 := []int{}
s3 := make([]int, 0)
fmt.Printf("s1 (addr: %p): %+8v\n",
&s1, *(*reflect.SliceHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&s1)))
fmt.Printf("s2 (addr: %p): %+8v\n",
&s2, *(*reflect.SliceHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&s2)))
fmt.Printf("s3 (addr: %p): %+8v\n",
&s3, *(*reflect.SliceHeader)(unsafe.Pointer(&s3)))
Output (try it on the Go Playground):
s1 (addr: 0x1040a130): {Data: 0 Len: 0 Cap: 0}
s2 (addr: 0x1040a140): {Data: 1535812 Len: 0 Cap: 0}
s3 (addr: 0x1040a150): {Data: 1535812 Len: 0 Cap: 0}
What do we see?
nil slice has 0 data pointers2 and s3 slices do have the same data pointer, sharing / pointing to the same 0-sized memory value