Estimate Autocorrelation using Python

后端 未结 5 1089
庸人自扰
庸人自扰 2020-12-02 07:34

I would like to perform Autocorrelation on the signal shown below. The time between two consecutive points is 2.5ms (or a repetition rate of 400Hz).

5条回答
  •  北海茫月
    2020-12-02 07:50

    The method I wrote as of my latest edit is now faster than even scipy.statstools.acf with fft=True until the sample size gets very large.

    Error analysis If you want to adjust for biases & get highly accurate error estimates: Look at my code here which implements this paper by Ulli Wolff (or original by UW in Matlab)

    Functions Tested

    • a = correlatedData(n=10000) is from a routine found here
    • gamma() is from same place as correlated_data()
    • acorr() is my function below
    • estimated_autocorrelation is found in another answer
    • acf() is from from statsmodels.tsa.stattools import acf

    Timings

    %timeit a0, junk, junk = gamma(a, f=0)                            # puwr.py
    %timeit a1 = [acorr(a, m, i) for i in range(l)]                   # my own
    %timeit a2 = acf(a)                                               # statstools
    %timeit a3 = estimated_autocorrelation(a)                         # numpy
    %timeit a4 = acf(a, fft=True)                                     # stats FFT
    
    ## -- End pasted text --
    100 loops, best of 3: 7.18 ms per loop
    100 loops, best of 3: 2.15 ms per loop
    10 loops, best of 3: 88.3 ms per loop
    10 loops, best of 3: 87.6 ms per loop
    100 loops, best of 3: 3.33 ms per loop
    

    Edit... I checked again keeping l=40 and changing n=10000 to n=200000 samples the FFT methods start to get a bit of traction and statsmodels fft implementation just edges it... (order is the same)

    ## -- End pasted text --
    10 loops, best of 3: 86.2 ms per loop
    10 loops, best of 3: 69.5 ms per loop
    1 loops, best of 3: 16.2 s per loop
    1 loops, best of 3: 16.3 s per loop
    10 loops, best of 3: 52.3 ms per loop
    

    Edit 2: I changed my routine and re-tested vs. the FFT for n=10000 and n=20000

    a = correlatedData(n=200000); b=correlatedData(n=10000)
    m = a.mean(); rng = np.arange(40); mb = b.mean()
    %timeit a1 = map(lambda t:acorr(a, m, t), rng)
    %timeit a1 = map(lambda t:acorr.acorr(b, mb, t), rng)
    %timeit a4 = acf(a, fft=True)
    %timeit a4 = acf(b, fft=True)
    
    10 loops, best of 3: 73.3 ms per loop   # acorr below
    100 loops, best of 3: 2.37 ms per loop  # acorr below
    10 loops, best of 3: 79.2 ms per loop   # statstools with FFT
    100 loops, best of 3: 2.69 ms per loop # statstools with FFT
    

    Implementation

    def acorr(op_samples, mean, separation, norm = 1):
        """autocorrelation of a measured operator with optional normalisation
        the autocorrelation is measured over the 0th axis
    
        Required Inputs
            op_samples  :: np.ndarray :: the operator samples
            mean        :: float :: the mean of the operator
            separation  :: int :: the separation between HMC steps
            norm        :: float :: the autocorrelation with separation=0
        """
        return ((op_samples[:op_samples.size-separation] - mean)*(op_samples[separation:]- mean)).ravel().mean() / norm
    

    4x speedup can be achieved below. You must be careful to only pass op_samples=a.copy() as it will modify the array a by a-=mean otherwise:

    op_samples -= mean
    return (op_samples[:op_samples.size-separation]*op_samples[separation:]).ravel().mean() / norm
    

    Sanity Check

    Example Error Analysis

    This is a bit out of scope but I can't be bothered to redo the figure without the integrated autocorrelation time or integration window calculation. The autocorrelations with errors are clear in the bottom plot

提交回复
热议问题