Constructor in an Interface?

Question

I know it\'s not possible to define a constructor in an interface. But I\'m wondering why, because I think it could be very useful.

So you could be sure that some fi

Answer 1

Taking some of the things you have described:

"So you could be sure that some fields in a class are defined for every implementation of this interface."

"If a define a Interface for this class so that I can have more classes which implement the message interface, I can only define the send method and not the constructor"

...these requirements are exactly what abstract classes are for.