flex property not working in IE

前端 未结 5 1125
陌清茗
陌清茗 2020-11-22 01:59

I have been unable to determine why flexbox is not working in IE 11.

For testing, I sourced a very simple flexbox layout from CodePen and have pasted the information

5条回答
  •  说谎
    说谎 (楼主)
    2020-11-22 02:58

    IE has a problem parsing the flex property.

    Here are a few workarounds that have worked for me:

    • Use the long-hand properties instead of the shorthand.

      Instead of something like this: flex: 0 0 35%.

      Try this:

      • flex-grow: 0
      • flex-shrink: 0
      • flex-basis: 35%

    • Make sure flex-shrink is enabled.

      So instead of this: flex: 0 0 35%

      Try this: flex: 0 1 35%

      (In other cases flex-shrink needs to be disabled: Flex item overlaps another item in IE11)


    • Careful with percentage and unitless values with flex-basis

      This may depend on your version of IE11. Behavior appears to vary.

      Try these variations:

      • flex: 1 1 0
      • flex: 1 1 0px
      • flex: 1 1 0%

    Beware! Certain css minifiers will replace 0px with 0, which can be a really annoying thing to debug (however, they won't change 0% for some reason).

    More details here:

    • Image behavior within flexbox (rows embedded in columns)
    • Why does shorthand flex property behave differently than long hand properties in IE?

    • Instead of flex: 1 use flex: auto (or add in flex-basis: auto)

      If you're using flex: 1 in flex-direction: row (such as on larger screens), and you switch to flex-direction: column in a media query (let's say for mobile devices), you may find that your flex items collapse.

      In your media query, add flex-basis: auto. This will override the flex-basis value in the flex: 1 rule (which is usually 0, 0px or 0%, depending on the browser).

      Using flex: auto should also work, which is short for:

      • flex-grow: 1
      • flex-shrink: 1
      • flex-basis: auto

    • Use old-fashion width / height properties instead of flex.

    • Use block layout instead of flex layout.

      You don't need to completely abandon flex layout. But for a particular container you may be able to get the job done with display: block instead of display: flex; flex-direction: column.

      For example, in needing to use the padding trick to responsively embed a video in a flex item, the obstacle I faced was that some browsers don't work well with percentage padding (or margin) in a flex container.

      To make it work I switched the display value on the flex item from this:

      /* a flex item, also a nested flex container */
      #footer-container > article {
          display: flex;
          flex-direction: column;
      }
      

      to this:

      #footer-container > article {
          display: block;
      }
      

提交回复
热议问题