Does linux allow any system call to be made from signal handlers?

Question

My understanding is that, in general, the behavior is undefined if you call a non-async signal safe function from a signal handler, but I\'ve heard that linux allows you to

Answer 1

According to section 2 signal manual:

See signal(7) for a list of the async-signal-safe functions that can be safely called from inside a signal handler.

And section 7 signals manual lists the following functions and/or system calls along with a pretty clear description:

Async-signal-safe functions

   A signal handler function must be very careful, since processing elsewhere may
   be interrupted at some arbitrary point in the execution of the program.  POSIX
   has the concept of "safe function".  If a signal interrupts the execution of
   an unsafe function, and handler calls an unsafe function, then the behavior of
   the program is undefined.

   POSIX.1-2004 (also known as POSIX.1-2001 Technical Corrigendum 2) requires an
   implementation to guarantee that the following functions can be safely called
   inside a signal handler:

       _Exit()
       _exit()
       abort()
       accept()
       access()
       aio_error()
       aio_return()
       aio_suspend()
       alarm()
       bind()
       cfgetispeed()
       cfgetospeed()
       cfsetispeed()
       cfsetospeed()
       chdir()
       chmod()
       chown()
       clock_gettime()
       close()
       connect()
       creat()
       dup()
       dup2()
       execle()
       execve()
       fchmod()
       fchown()
       fcntl()
       fdatasync()
       fork()
       fpathconf()
       fstat()
       fsync()
       ftruncate()
       getegid()
       geteuid()
       getgid()
       getgroups()
       getpeername()
       getpgrp()
       getpid()
       getppid()
       getsockname()
       getsockopt()
       getuid()
       kill()
       link()
       listen()
       lseek()
       lstat()
       mkdir()
       mkfifo()
       open()
       pathconf()
       pause()
       pipe()
       poll()
       posix_trace_event()
       pselect()
       raise()
       read()
       readlink()
       recv()
       recvfrom()
       recvmsg()
       rename()
       rmdir()
       select()
       sem_post()
       send()
       sendmsg()
       sendto()
       setgid()
       setpgid()
       setsid()
       setsockopt()
       setuid()
       shutdown()
       sigaction()
       sigaddset()
       sigdelset()
       sigemptyset()
       sigfillset()
       sigismember()
       signal()
       sigpause()
       sigpending()
       sigprocmask()
       sigqueue()
       sigset()
       sigsuspend()
       sleep()
       sockatmark()
       socket()
       socketpair()
       stat()
       symlink()
       sysconf()
       tcdrain()
       tcflow()
       tcflush()
       tcgetattr()
       tcgetpgrp()
       tcsendbreak()
       tcsetattr()
       tcsetpgrp()
       time()
       timer_getoverrun()
       timer_gettime()
       timer_settime()
       times()
       umask()
       uname()
       unlink()
       utime()
       wait()
       waitpid()
       write()

   POSIX.1-2008 removes fpathconf(), pathconf(), and sysconf() from the above
   list, and adds the following functions:

       execl()
       execv()
       faccessat()
       fchmodat()
       fchownat()
       fexecve()
       fstatat()
       futimens()
       linkat()
       mkdirat()
       mkfifoat()
       mknod()
       mknodat()
       openat()
       readlinkat()
       renameat()
       symlinkat()
       unlinkat()
       utimensat()
       utimes()

I believe this information to be more reliable than something that we hear sometimes somewhere . So Linux does allow only some system calls but not all of them. So the answer to your question is simply — no.