I was reading the C Standard the other day, and noticed that unlike signed integer overflow (which is undefined), unsigned integer overflow is well defined. I\'ve seen it us
Since signed numbers on CPUs can be represented in different ways, 99.999% of all current CPUs use twos-complement notation. Since this is the majority of machines out there, it is difficult to find a different behaviour although the compiler might check it (fat chance). The C specs however must account for 100% of the compilers so have not defined its behaviour.
So it would make things more confusion, which is a good reason to avoid it. However, if you have a really good reason (say, performance boost of factor of 3 for critical part of code), then document it well and use it.