Which is better way to calculate nCr

前端 未结 5 665
情深已故
情深已故 2020-11-30 23:48

Approach 1:
C(n,r) = n!/(n-r)!r!

Approach 2:
In the book Combinatorial Algorithms by wilf, i have found this:
C(n,r) can be written as C(n-1,r) + C

5条回答
  •  没有蜡笔的小新
    2020-12-01 00:27

    Both approaches will save time, but the first one is very prone to integer overflow.

    Approach 1:

    This approach will generate result in shortest time (in at most n/2 iterations), and the possibility of overflow can be reduced by doing the multiplications carefully:

    long long C(int n, int r) {
        if(r > n - r) r = n - r; // because C(n, r) == C(n, n - r)
        long long ans = 1;
        int i;
    
        for(i = 1; i <= r; i++) {
            ans *= n - r + i;
            ans /= i;
        }
    
        return ans;
    }
    

    This code will start multiplication of the numerator from the smaller end, and as the product of any k consecutive integers is divisible by k!, there will be no divisibility problem. But the possibility of overflow is still there, another useful trick may be dividing n - r + i and i by their GCD before doing the multiplication and division (and still overflow may occur).

    Approach 2:

    In this approach, you'll be actually building up the Pascal's Triangle. The dynamic approach is much faster than the recursive one (the first one is O(n^2) while the other is exponential). However, you'll need to use O(n^2) memory too.

    # define MAX 100 // assuming we need first 100 rows
    long long triangle[MAX + 1][MAX + 1];
    
    void makeTriangle() {
        int i, j;
    
        // initialize the first row
        triangle[0][0] = 1; // C(0, 0) = 1
    
        for(i = 1; i < MAX; i++) {
            triangle[i][0] = 1; // C(i, 0) = 1
            for(j = 1; j <= i; j++) {
                triangle[i][j] = triangle[i - 1][j - 1] + triangle[i - 1][j];
            }
        }
    }
    
    long long C(int n, int r) {
        return triangle[n][r];
    }
    

    Then you can look up any C(n, r) in O(1) time.

    If you need a particular C(n, r) (i.e. the full triangle is not needed), then the memory consumption can be made O(n) by overwriting the same row of the triangle, top to bottom.

    # define MAX 100
    long long row[MAX + 1];
    
    int C(int n, int r) {
        int i, j;
    
        // initialize by the first row
        row[0] = 1; // this is the value of C(0, 0)
    
        for(i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
            for(j = i; j > 0; j--) {
                 // from the recurrence C(n, r) = C(n - 1, r - 1) + C(n - 1, r)
                 row[j] += row[j - 1];
            }
        }
    
        return row[r];
    }
    

    The inner loop is started from the end to simplify the calculations. If you start it from index 0, you'll need another variable to store the value being overwritten.

提交回复
热议问题