I am talking about \"type(value)\"-style casts. The books I have read pass over them quickly, saying only that they are semantically equivalent to C-style casts, \"(type) va
It is somewhat easier to parse the function-style casts in a language where parentheses are already heavily (over-)used.
Were they a mistake? Possibly - but only to the extent that they were unable to completely supersede the C-style casts, and therefore provided a Perl-like "there's more than one way to do it" mechanism for casting. With the explicit and distinctive modern casts:
dynamic_cast(value);
reinterpret_cast(value);
static_cast(value);
const_cast(value);
there is no reason to use the C-style casts any more, and less reason to use function-style casts.