Regardless of how \'bad\' the code is, and assuming that alignment etc are not an issue on the compiler/platform, is this undefined or broken behavior?
If I have a s
In C++ if you really need it - create operator[]:
struct data
{
int a, b, c;
int &operator[]( size_t idx ) {
switch( idx ) {
case 0 : return a;
case 1 : return b;
case 2 : return c;
default: throw std::runtime_error( "bad index" );
}
}
};
data d;
d[0] = 123; // assign 123 to data.a
it is not only guaranteed to work but usage is simpler, you do not need to write unreadable expression (&thing.a)[0]
Note: this answer is given in assumption that you already have a structure with fields, and you need to add access via index. If speed is an issue and you can change the structure this could be more effective:
struct data
{
int array[3];
int &a = array[0];
int &b = array[1];
int &c = array[2];
};
This solution would change size of structure so you can use methods as well:
struct data
{
int array[3];
int &a() { return array[0]; }
int &b() { return array[1]; }
int &c() { return array[2]; }
};