Can anyone amend namedtuple or provide an alternative class so that it works for mutable objects?
Primarily for readability, I would like something similar to namedt
There is a mutable alternative to collections.namedtuple
- recordclass.
It has the same API and memory footprint as namedtuple
and it supports assignments (It should be faster as well). For example:
from recordclass import recordclass
Point = recordclass('Point', 'x y')
>>> p = Point(1, 2)
>>> p
Point(x=1, y=2)
>>> print(p.x, p.y)
1 2
>>> p.x += 2; p.y += 3; print(p)
Point(x=3, y=5)
For python 3.6 and higher recordclass
(since 0.5) support typehints:
from recordclass import recordclass, RecordClass
class Point(RecordClass):
x: int
y: int
>>> Point.__annotations__
{'x':int, 'y':int}
>>> p = Point(1, 2)
>>> p
Point(x=1, y=2)
>>> print(p.x, p.y)
1 2
>>> p.x += 2; p.y += 3; print(p)
Point(x=3, y=5)
There is a more complete example (it also includes performance comparisons).
Since 0.9 recordclass
library provides another variant -- recordclass.structclass
factory function. It can produce classes, whose instances occupy less memory than __slots__
-based instances. This is can be important for the instances with attribute values, which has not intended to have reference cycles. It may help reduce memory usage if you need to create millions of instances. Here is an illustrative example.