While I was trying to learn about C++ operators, I stumbled upon a strange comparison operator on cppreference.com,* in a table that looked like
On 2017-11-11, the ISO C++ committee adopted Herb Sutter's proposal for the <=> "spaceship" three-way comparison operator as one of the new features that were added to C++20. In the paper titled Consistent comparison Sutter, Maurer and Brown demonstrate the concepts of the new design. For an overview of the proposal, here's an excerpt from the article:
The expression a <=> b returns an object that compares <0 if a < b, compares >0 if a > b, and compares ==0 if a and b are equal/equivalent.
Common case: To write all comparisons for your type X with type Y, with memberwise semantics, just write:
auto X::operator<=>(const Y&) =default;Advanced cases: To write all comparisons for your type X with type Y, just write operator<=> that takes a Y, can use =default to get memberwise semantics if desired, and returns the appropriate category type:
- Return an _ordering if your type naturally supports <, and we’ll efficiently generate symmetric <, >, <=, >=, ==, and !=; otherwise return an _equality, and we’ll efficiently generate symmetric == and !=.
- Return strong_ if for your type a == b implies f(a) == f(b) (substitutability, where f reads only comparison-salient state that is accessible using the public const members), otherwise return weak_.
Five comparison categories are defined as std:: types, each having the following predefined values:
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| | Numeric values | Non-numeric |
| Category +-----------------------------------+ |
| | -1 | 0 | +1 | values |
+------------------+------+------------+---------------+-------------+
| strong_ordering | less | equal | greater | |
| weak_ordering | less | equivalent | greater | |
| partial_ordering | less | equivalent | greater | unordered |
| strong_equality | | equal | nonequal | |
| weak_equality | | equivalent | nonequivalent | |
+------------------+------+------------+---------------+-------------+
Implicit conversions between these types are defined as follows:
strong_ordering with values {less, equal, greater} implicitly converts to:
weak_ordering with values {less, equivalent, greater}partial_ordering with values {less, equivalent, greater}strong_equality with values {unequal, equal, unequal}weak_equality with values {nonequivalent, equivalent, nonequivalent}weak_ordering with values {less, equivalent, greater} implicitly converts to:
partial_ordering with values {less, equivalent, greater}weak_equality with values {nonequivalent, equivalent, nonequivalent}partial_ordering with values {less, equivalent, greater, unordered} implicitly converts to:
weak_equality with values {nonequivalent, equivalent, nonequivalent, nonequivalent}strong_equality with values {equal, unequal} implicitly converts to:
weak_equality with values {equivalent, nonequivalent} The<=>token is introduced. The character sequence<=>tokenizes to<= >, in old source code. For example,X<&Y::operator<=>needs to add a space to retain its meaning.
The overloadable operator<=>is a three-way comparison function and has precedence higher than< and lower than<<. It returns a type that can be compared against literal0but other return types are allowed such as to support expression templates. All<=>operators defined in the language and in the standard library return one of the 5 aforementionedstd::comparison category types.
For language types, the following built-in<=>same-type comparisons are provided. All are constexpr, except where noted otherwise. These comparisons cannot be invoked heterogeneously using scalar promotions/conversions.
bool, integral, and pointer types,<=>returnsstrong_ordering. <=>, and there are built-in heterogeneousoperator<=>(T*, nullptr_t). Only comparisons of pointers to the same object/allocation are constant expressions.<=> returnspartial_ordering, and can be invoked heterogeneously by widening arguments to a larger floating point type.<=> returns the same as the enumeration's underlying type's<=>.nullptr_t,<=> returnsstrong_orderingand always yieldsequal.T[N] <=> T[N]returns the same type asT's<=>and performs lexicographical elementwise comparison. There is no<=>for other arrays.voidthere is no<=>.To better understand the inner workings of this operator, please read the original paper. This is just what I've found out using search engines.