varchar or nvarchar

后端 未结 9 2017
走了就别回头了
走了就别回头了 2021-02-19 13:54

I am storing first name and last name with up to 30 characters each. Which is better varchar or nvarchar.

I have read that nvarchar

9条回答
  •  星月不相逢
    2021-02-19 14:50

    First of all, to clarify, nvarchar stores unicode data while varchar stores ANSI (8-bit) data. They function identically but nvarchar takes up twice as much space.

    Generally, I prefer storing user names using varchar datatypes unless those names have characters which fall out of the boundary of characters which varchar can store.

    It also depends on database collation also. For e.g. you'll not be able to store Russian characters in a varchar field, if your database collation is LATIN_CS_AS. But, if you are working on a local application, which will be used only in Russia, you'd set the database collation to Russian. What this will do is that it will allow you to enter Russian characters in a varchar field, saving some space.

    But, now-a-days, most of the applications being developed are international, so you'd yourself have to decide which all users will be signing up, and based on that decide the datatype.

提交回复
热议问题