Using void in functions without parameter?

Question

In C++ using void in a function with no parameter, for example:

class WinMessage
{
public:
    BOOL Translate(void);
};

is redunda

Answer 1

I feel like no. Reasons:

• A lot more code out there has the BOOL Translate() form, so others reading your code will be more comfortable and productive with it.
• Having less on the screen (especially something redundant like this) means less thinking for somebody reading your code.
• Sometimes people, who didn't program in C in 1988, ask "What does foo(void) mean?"