I\'m not entirely sure if there\'s a standard in the industry or otherwise, so I\'m asking here.
I\'m naming a Users table, and I\'m not entire
Look at it as an entity and name the fields accordingly
I'd suggest a User table, with fields such as id, name, age, etc.
A group of records is a bunch of users, but the group of fields represents a user.
Thus, you end up referring to user.id, user.name, user.age (though you won't always include the table name, depending on the query).