In various Scala literature I see some self-type annotations using \"this\" and others using \"self\":
trait A { this: B => ... }
trait A { self: B =>
There is a difference in that this always refers to the object defined by the innermost template.
The expression
thiscan appear in the statement part of a template or compound type. It stands for the object being defined by the innermost template or compound type enclosing the reference. If this is a compound type, the type ofthisis that compound type. If it is a template of a class or object definition with simple name C, the type of this is the same as the type of C.this. (Scala Ref. §6.5)
So, if you call your self-type foo, you could still refer to it as this (unless, of course, you are in an inner template in which case this will refer to the object defined by it – and unless you don’t give the inner template’s self-type the same name) but obviously not the other way round.