What is the difference between canonical name, simple name and class name in Java Class?

Question

In Java, what is the difference between these:

Object o1 = ....
o1.getClass().getSimpleName();
o1.getClass().getName();
o1.getClass().getCanonicalName();
         


        

Answer 1

Adding local classes, lambdas and the toString() method to complete the previous two answers. Further, I add arrays of lambdas and arrays of anonymous classes (which do not make any sense in practice though):

package com.example;

public final class TestClassNames {
    private static void showClass(Class c) {
        System.out.println("getName():          " + c.getName());
        System.out.println("getCanonicalName(): " + c.getCanonicalName());
        System.out.println("getSimpleName():    " + c.getSimpleName());
        System.out.println("toString():         " + c.toString());
        System.out.println();
    }

    private static void x(Runnable r) {
        showClass(r.getClass());
        showClass(java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(r.getClass(), 1).getClass()); // Obtains an array class of a lambda base type.
    }

    public static class NestedClass {}

    public class InnerClass {}

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        class LocalClass {}
        showClass(void.class);
        showClass(int.class);
        showClass(String.class);
        showClass(Runnable.class);
        showClass(SomeEnum.class);
        showClass(SomeAnnotation.class);
        showClass(int[].class);
        showClass(String[].class);
        showClass(NestedClass.class);
        showClass(InnerClass.class);
        showClass(LocalClass.class);
        showClass(LocalClass[].class);
        Object anonymous = new java.io.Serializable() {};
        showClass(anonymous.getClass());
        showClass(java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(anonymous.getClass(), 1).getClass()); // Obtains an array class of an anonymous base type.
        x(() -> {});
    }
}

enum SomeEnum {
   BLUE, YELLOW, RED;
}

@interface SomeAnnotation {}

This is the full output:

getName():          void
getCanonicalName(): void
getSimpleName():    void
toString():         void

getName():          int
getCanonicalName(): int
getSimpleName():    int
toString():         int

getName():          java.lang.String
getCanonicalName(): java.lang.String
getSimpleName():    String
toString():         class java.lang.String

getName():          java.lang.Runnable
getCanonicalName(): java.lang.Runnable
getSimpleName():    Runnable
toString():         interface java.lang.Runnable

getName():          com.example.SomeEnum
getCanonicalName(): com.example.SomeEnum
getSimpleName():    SomeEnum
toString():         class com.example.SomeEnum

getName():          com.example.SomeAnnotation
getCanonicalName(): com.example.SomeAnnotation
getSimpleName():    SomeAnnotation
toString():         interface com.example.SomeAnnotation

getName():          [I
getCanonicalName(): int[]
getSimpleName():    int[]
toString():         class [I

getName():          [Ljava.lang.String;
getCanonicalName(): java.lang.String[]
getSimpleName():    String[]
toString():         class [Ljava.lang.String;

getName():          com.example.TestClassNames$NestedClass
getCanonicalName(): com.example.TestClassNames.NestedClass
getSimpleName():    NestedClass
toString():         class com.example.TestClassNames$NestedClass

getName():          com.example.TestClassNames$InnerClass
getCanonicalName(): com.example.TestClassNames.InnerClass
getSimpleName():    InnerClass
toString():         class com.example.TestClassNames$InnerClass

getName():          com.example.TestClassNames$1LocalClass
getCanonicalName(): null
getSimpleName():    LocalClass
toString():         class com.example.TestClassNames$1LocalClass

getName():          [Lcom.example.TestClassNames$1LocalClass;
getCanonicalName(): null
getSimpleName():    LocalClass[]
toString():         class [Lcom.example.TestClassNames$1LocalClass;

getName():          com.example.TestClassNames$1
getCanonicalName(): null
getSimpleName():    
toString():         class com.example.TestClassNames$1

getName():          [Lcom.example.TestClassNames$1;
getCanonicalName(): null
getSimpleName():    []
toString():         class [Lcom.example.TestClassNames$1;

getName():          com.example.TestClassNames$$Lambda$1/1175962212
getCanonicalName(): com.example.TestClassNames$$Lambda$1/1175962212
getSimpleName():    TestClassNames$$Lambda$1/1175962212
toString():         class com.example.TestClassNames$$Lambda$1/1175962212

getName():          [Lcom.example.TestClassNames$$Lambda$1;
getCanonicalName(): com.example.TestClassNames$$Lambda$1/1175962212[]
getSimpleName():    TestClassNames$$Lambda$1/1175962212[]
toString():         class [Lcom.example.TestClassNames$$Lambda$1;

So, here are the rules. First, lets start with primitive types and void:

1. If the class object represents a primitive type or void, all the four methods simply returns its name.

Now the rules for the getName() method:

2. Every non-lambda and non-array class or interface (i.e, top-level, nested, inner, local and anonymous) has a name (which is returned by getName()) that is the package name followed by a dot (if there is a package), followed by the name of its class-file as generated by the compiler (whithout the suffix .class). If there is no package, it is simply the name of the class-file. If the class is an inner, nested, local or anonymous class, the compiler should generate at least one $ in its class-file name. Note that for anonymous classes, the class name would end with a dollar-sign followed by a number.
3. Lambda class names are generally unpredictable, and you shouldn't care about they anyway. Exactly, their name is the name of the enclosing class, followed by $$Lambda$, followed by a number, followed by a slash, followed by another number.
4. The class descriptor of the primitives are Z for boolean, B for byte, S for short, C for char, I for int, J for long, F for float and D for double. For non-array classes and interfaces the class descriptor is L followed by what is given by getName() followed by ;. For array classes, the class descriptor is [ followed by the class descriptor of the component type (which may be itself another array class).
5. For array classes, the getName() method returns its class descriptor. This rule seems to fail only for array classes whose the component type is a lambda (which possibly is a bug), but hopefully this should not matter anyway because there is no point even on the existence of array classes whose component type is a lambda.

Now, the toString() method:

6. If the class instance represents an interface (or an annotation, which is a special type of interface), the toString() returns "interface " + getName(). If it is a primitive, it returns simply getName(). If it is something else (a class type, even if it is a pretty weird one), it returns "class " + getName().

The getCanonicalName() method:

7. For top-level classes and interfaces, the getCanonicalName() method returns just what the getName() method returns.
8. The getCanonicalName() method returns null for anonymous or local classes and for array classes of those.
9. For inner and nested classes and interfaces, the getCanonicalName() method returns what the getName() method would replacing the compiler-introduced dollar-signs by dots.
10. For array classes, the getCanonicalName() method returns null if the canonical name of the component type is null. Otherwise, it returns the canonical name of the component type followed by [].

The getSimpleName() method:

11. For top-level, nested, inner and local classes, the getSimpleName() returns the name of the class as written in the source file.
12. For anonymous classes the getSimpleName() returns an empty String.
13. For lambda classes the getSimpleName() just returns what the getName() would return without the package name. This do not makes much sense and looks like a bug for me, but there is no point in calling getSimpleName() on a lambda class to start with.
14. For array classes the getSimpleName() method returns the simple name of the component class followed by []. This have the funny/weird side-effect that array classes whose component type is an anonymous class have just [] as their simple names.