rebase

问题 There are plenty of SO answers and tutorials on the web that say there is a difference between which branch is ours and which branch is theirs depending on whether it's a rebase or a merge, and explain why, usually with a handy table, as do the man pages and online docs (sans the table). Thing is, I don't care to remember. I'm not a fan of cognitive load for trivial things that the computer should be able to tell me or simply show me . Is there a command or ENV var or suchlike that contains

问题 There are plenty of SO answers and tutorials on the web that say there is a difference between which branch is ours and which branch is theirs depending on whether it's a rebase or a merge, and explain why, usually with a handy table, as do the man pages and online docs (sans the table). Thing is, I don't care to remember. I'm not a fan of cognitive load for trivial things that the computer should be able to tell me or simply show me . Is there a command or ENV var or suchlike that contains

问题 There are plenty of SO answers and tutorials on the web that say there is a difference between which branch is ours and which branch is theirs depending on whether it's a rebase or a merge, and explain why, usually with a handy table, as do the man pages and online docs (sans the table). Thing is, I don't care to remember. I'm not a fan of cognitive load for trivial things that the computer should be able to tell me or simply show me . Is there a command or ENV var or suchlike that contains

问题 I'm trying to understand how git rebase handles merges. I thought that with -p , it would be able to rebase conflicting merge that would have already been resolved. But it seams like it doesn't. Here is an example to illustrate the issue: git init touch a && git add . && git commit -m 'first commit' git branch b git branch c echo 'a' >> a && git add . && git commit -m a git checkout b echo 'b' >> a && git add . && git commit -m b git checkout master git merge b echo ab > a git add . git

问题 Our current workflow: create a feature branch from dev. after developing the feature and having pushed the branch do a the following: git checkout dev git pull --rebase (on dev) git checkout my-feature-branch git rebase dev resolve conflicts and then do a git push -f or git push (first time). My question comes from one of our development team members: Do we need to do the whole process as is, or can we just make the pull-request directly, especially that the response is always "I am working

问题 Our current workflow: create a feature branch from dev. after developing the feature and having pushed the branch do a the following: git checkout dev git pull --rebase (on dev) git checkout my-feature-branch git rebase dev resolve conflicts and then do a git push -f or git push (first time). My question comes from one of our development team members: Do we need to do the whole process as is, or can we just make the pull-request directly, especially that the response is always "I am working

问题 I have a problem, please be kind enough to advise! I have an existing git repo, and for various reasons(that I wont go into here), I am trying to create a ROOT commit Say this is my git commit history: (ROOT) C1 <-C2 <-C3 <-C4 <-C5 <--branchname (HEAD) I want to add an initial commit (CX, which is not empty) BEFORE C1. So it should end up like this: (NEW ROOT) CX-C1 <-C2 <-C3 <-C4 <-C5 <--branchname (HEAD) I found a similar question here: Insert a commit before the root commit in Git? But it

问题 If I am working on a feature branch, and I want to fetch and rebase in changes from the master branch, is there a shorter way to do it than this? git stash git checkout master git pull git checkout my-feature-branch git rebase master git stash pop Note how I have to stash too, because I have edited a config file that I don't want to commit. How can I do this in fewer commands? 回答1: One line version: git pull --rebase --autostash origin master 回答2: Perhaps you can write a script for this. I

问题 git rebase -i allows one to merge a commit with the previous one through squash or fixup . Both the options require at least one commit to be pick -ed. What about the case when one wants to use the very first commit but discard its commit message? In other words, if I want the very first commit to be merge with the subsequent ones, what should I do? 回答1: You just need the --root flag (available since Git 1.7.12, i.e., to everyone except certain unnamed never-updated cough*Centos*cough Linux

问题 We have two Git repositories. Repo 1. Commits: A, B, C. This repository was created from SVN history. Repo 2. Commits: D, E, F. This repository was created without SVN history, just by using the working copy (as of commit C) which became the commit D. In another words, the file trees of the commits C und D are the same. Now, we want to merge both repositories so we have the full history in one repository. Is there a way to "copy/rebase/something else" all the commits E..F onto C? 回答1: The