I'm trying to deploy a Django site on an Ubuntu machine. I need to install Psycopg2 and PIL but it seems that I'm able to install them using either apt-get or using pip. Is there a difference in installing by the two methods? I know that using pip, I'm able to install it into a virtual environment but with apt-get it installs in the global python environment.
可以将文章内容翻译成中文,广告屏蔽插件可能会导致该功能失效(如失效，请关闭广告屏蔽插件后再试):
问题:
回答1:
You probably already know the benefits of apt-get. Automatic update notifications, other apt-installed packages that need those tools know they're installed, etc.
With pip, you know you're getting the latest version at the time you install it, you can install to a non-default version of Python, and you can install to a virtualenv.
If you don't need any of the features pip gives you, and you don't routinely have to install other Python packages which aren't available over APT, use the APT versions.
回答2:
Most answers to this question miss one of the advantages using apt-get:
apt-get is pre-compiled, which installs much faster than pip.
To install numpy, matplotlib, pandas, and other scipy-related modules, apt-get only takes seconds; pip can easily consume 10min+.
If you have root access and don't mind a little outdated versions, apt-get is the fast & worry-free way to go.
回答3:
I always recommend installing Python package with pip, because some OS package managers do packages customizations, and it can either break or change package's behavior.
If you need to install a package globally:
$ sudo pip install PACKAGE And it will try to download your package from PyPI or project's links.
回答4:
You should be aware that what makes it in the package manager undergoes some integration testing, while what is in Pypi is untested.
Pypi is OK for development.
In production, you may go with Pypi, but you will soon learn that you can always rely on what is in the package manager...