问题
This article suggests otherwise. But there is still a need to evaluate the loop condition. Does java just employ a specific trick to recognize this case?
回答1:
Check out the follow-up story to the article you quote.
NOTE to people answering: It appears the OP is asking about the .NET JIT, not the Java JIT, since the article referenced suggested that Java did a better job of (or that only Java did) optimizing away empty loops.
EDIT: Googling for more answers, Jon Skeet's name keeps coming up. See, for example, this thread on C# optimizations. Thus, when he answers, we'll have the authoritative answer! :-)
回答2:
Yes it will.
http://www.javaspecialists.eu/archive/Issue158.html
At least in Java 5 and 6. The article you linked to is about an older VM.
回答3:
The article is from 2003. CLI (and java VMs) have advanced a lot since then. In general you have to be very cautious whenever doing micro benchmarks. It is real easy to end up measuring jit performance, compiler efficiency at removing dead code, timing overhead, garbage collection, and so on.
回答4:
Java doesn't always optimise way empty loops. In this case it took 2.966 seconds to count 4 BN numbers.
long start = System.nanoTime();
for (int i = Integer.MIN_VALUE; i < Integer.MAX_VALUE; i++);
long time = System.nanoTime() - start;
System.out.printf("Took %.3f seconds to empty loop.%n", time * 1e-9);
Prints
Took 2.966 seconds to empty loop.
This was using Java 6u11, perhaps 6u14 will be smarter.
回答5:
In general, try to write your code as simply as you can, so the JVM can make good guesses as to what you're trying to do.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/539047/does-net-jit-optimize-empty-loops-away