How is a Func<T> implicitly converted to Expression<Func<T>>?

筅森魡賤 提交于 2019-11-30 22:03:35

问题


I don't understand what is happening here:

Both of these lines compile:

 Func<object> func = () => new object();

 Expression<Func<object>> expression = ()=>new object();

But this doesn't:

 expression = func;

There isn't an implicit operator on LambdaExpression or Expression<TDelegate> that converts a delegate to the expression, so something else must be happening to make the assignment work. What is it?


回答1:


It's not an implicit conversion in the usual sense - it's a compiler trick. The compiler detects which one is expected from the context, and then compiles it either as a delegate (a hidden method on your class) or as an expression (a chunk of code that constructs the expression by calling the methods on System.Linq.Expressions.Expression).

This is the reason you can't directly assign a lambda expression to a variable of type object or var, among other things, because the compiler has to be able to know whether you mean a delegate or an expression.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5862266/how-is-a-funct-implicitly-converted-to-expressionfunct

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!