Matlab matrix multiplication speed

做~自己de王妃 提交于 2019-11-30 20:15:20

It's a combination of several things:

  • Matlab does indeed multi-thread.
  • The core is heavily optimized with vector instructions.

Here's the numbers on my machine: Core i7 920 @ 3.5 GHz (4 cores)

>> a = rand(10000);
>> b = rand(10000);
>> tic;a*b;toc
Elapsed time is 52.624931 seconds.

Task Manager shows 4 cores of CPU usage.

Now for some math:

Number of multiplies = 10000^3 = 1,000,000,000,000 = 10^12

Max multiplies in 53 secs =
    (3.5 GHz) * (4 cores) * (2 mul/cycle via SSE) * (52.6 secs) = 1.47 * 10^12

So Matlab is achieving about 1 / 1.47 = 68% efficiency of the maximum possible CPU throughput.

I see nothing out of the ordinary.

To check whether you do or not use multi-threading in MATLAB use this command

maxNumCompThreads(n)

This sets the number of cores to use to n. Now I have a Core i7-2620M, which has a maximum frequency of 2.7GHz, but it also has a turbo mode with 3.4GHz. The CPU has two cores. Let's see:

A = rand(5000);
B = rand(5000);
maxNumCompThreads(1);
tic; C=A*B; toc
Elapsed time is 10.167093 seconds.

maxNumCompThreads(2);
tic; C=A*B; toc
Elapsed time is 5.864663 seconds.

So there is multi-threading.

Let's look at the single CPU results. A*B executes approximately 5000^3 multiplications and additions. So the performance of single-threaded code is

5000^3*2/10.8 = 23 GFLOP/s

Now the CPU. 3.4 GHz, and Sandy Bridge can do maximum 8 FLOPs per cycle with AVX:

3.4 [Ginstructions/second] * 8 [FLOPs/instruction] = 27.2 GFLOP/s peak performance

So single core performance is around 85% peak, which is to be expected for this problem.

You really need to look deeply into the capabilities of your CPU to get accurate performannce estimates.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!