ExecutorService's shutdown() doesn't wait until all threads will be finished

问题

I have a code where 4 threads run at the same time. I want to wait until all these 4 threads will be finished. And only after that to continue the app flow.

I tried two approaches:

Thread#join(), this approach works as expected. The code, which comes after join() is executed only after all threads are finished.
ExecutorService#shutdown(), this technique allows executing code, which comes after shutdown() even if not all threads are finished.

Code sample:

ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(cpuCoresNum);

for (int i = 0; i < cpuCoresNum; i++) {

    service.submit(() -> {
        try {
            foo(); // some long execution function
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    });
}

service.shutdown();

System.out.println("We're done! All threads are finished!");

My question:

Why submit() and shutdown() don't wait until all threads will be finished and prints «We're done! All threads are finished!» right after call of service.shutdown();?

回答1:

The answer is available in the ExecutorService.shutdown() Javadoc:

This method does not wait for previously submitted tasks to complete execution. Use awaitTermination to do that.

If you want to wait for the threads to finish work you have the following options:

get Future instances returned by submit() and call get() on every Future instance
after calling shutdown on service call awaitTermination on service until it returns true
instead of calling submit on service add your Runnable instances to a java.util.List and pass this list to the invokeAll method called on service

回答2:

Thanks to @Adam Siemion suggestions, here is a final code:

ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(cpuCoresNum);

int itNum = 1;

for (int i = 0; i < cpuCoresNum; i++) {

    int treadID = itNum++;

    service.submit(() -> {
        Thread.currentThread().setName("Thread_#" + treadID);
        try {
            foo();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
    });
}

// wait until all threads will be finished
service.shutdown();
try {
    service.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
    e.printStackTrace();
}

回答3:

Recommended way from oracle documentation page of ExecutorService:

 void shutdownAndAwaitTermination(ExecutorService pool) {
   pool.shutdown(); // Disable new tasks from being submitted
   try {
     // Wait a while for existing tasks to terminate
     if (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) {
       pool.shutdownNow(); // Cancel currently executing tasks
       // Wait a while for tasks to respond to being cancelled
       if (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS))
           System.err.println("Pool did not terminate");
     }
   } catch (InterruptedException ie) {
     // (Re-)Cancel if current thread also interrupted
     pool.shutdownNow();
     // Preserve interrupt status
     Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
   }

shutdown(): Initiates an orderly shutdown in which previously submitted tasks are executed, but no new tasks will be accepted.

shutdownNow():Attempts to stop all actively executing tasks, halts the processing of waiting tasks, and returns a list of the tasks that were awaiting execution.

In above example, if your tasks are taking more time to complete, you can change if condition to while condition

Replace

if (!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS))

with

 while(!pool.awaitTermination(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS)) {
     Thread.sleep(60000);
 }

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36376179/executorservices-shutdown-doesnt-wait-until-all-threads-will-be-finished

标签

java

multithreading

concurrency

executorservice

java-threads