in c: func(void) vs. func() [duplicate]

一笑奈何 提交于 2019-11-26 11:06:58

问题


When a C function does not accept any arguments, does it have to be declared/defined with a \"void\" parameter by the language rules? PC-Lint seems to have problems when there\'s nothing at all in the argument-list, and I was wondering if it\'s something in the language syntax that I don\'t know about.

Edit: I just found a duplicate (back-dupe? it came first) question, C void arguments, which has more answers and explanations.


回答1:


void means the function does not take any parameters. For example,

int init (void)
{
    return 1;
}

This is not the same as defining

int init ()
{
    return 1;
}

because in the second case the compiler will not check whether the function is really called with no arguments at all; instead, a function call with arbitrary number of arguments will be accepted without any warnings (this is implemented only for the compatibility with the old-style function definition syntax, pre-ANSI).




回答2:


IIRC func(void) in C will declare a function that takes no parameters whereas func() declares a function that will take any number of parameters. I believe the latter is an artifact coming from pre-ANSI C.

According to Wikipedia here, the declaration func() does basically declare the function "without information about the parameters".



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1163879/in-c-funcvoid-vs-func

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!