I'm struggling to get the console sink working with PySpark Structured Streaming when run from Zeppelin. Basically, I'm not seeing any results printed to the screen, or to any logfiles I've found.
My question: Does anyone have a working example of using PySpark Structured Streaming with a sink that produces output visible in Apache Zeppelin? Ideally it would also use the socket source, as that's easy to test with.
I'm using:
- Ubuntu 16.04
- spark-2.2.0-bin-hadoop2.7
- zeppelin-0.7.3-bin-all
- Python3
I've based my code on the structured_network_wordcount.py example. It works when run from the PySpark shell (./bin/pyspark --master local[2]); I see tables per batch.
%pyspark
# structured streaming
from pyspark.sql.functions import *
lines = spark\
.readStream\
.format('socket')\
.option('host', 'localhost')\
.option('port', 9999)\
.option('includeTimestamp', 'true')\
.load()
# Split the lines into words, retaining timestamps
# split() splits each line into an array, and explode() turns the array into multiple rows
words = lines.select(
explode(split(lines.value, ' ')).alias('word'),
lines.timestamp
)
# Group the data by window and word and compute the count of each group
windowedCounts = words.groupBy(
window(words.timestamp, '10 seconds', '1 seconds'),
words.word
).count().orderBy('window')
# Start running the query that prints the windowed word counts to the console
query = windowedCounts\
.writeStream\
.outputMode('complete')\
.format('console')\
.option('truncate', 'false')\
.start()
print("Starting...")
query.awaitTermination(20)
I'd expect to see printouts of results for each batch, but instead I just see Starting..., and then False, the return value of query.awaitTermination(20).
In a separate terminal I'm entering some data into a nc -lk 9999 netcat session while the above is running.
Console sink is not a good choice for interactive notebook-based workflow. Even in Scala, where the output can be captured, it requires awaitTermination call (or equivalent) in the same paragraph, effectively blocking the note.
%spark
spark
.readStream
.format("socket")
.option("host", "localhost")
.option("port", "9999")
.option("includeTimestamp", "true")
.load()
.writeStream
.outputMode("append")
.format("console")
.option("truncate", "false")
.start()
.awaitTermination() // Block execution, to force Zeppelin to capture the output
Chained awaitTermination could be replaced with standalone call in the same paragraph would work as well:
%spark
val query = df
.writeStream
...
.start()
query.awaitTermination()
Without it, Zeppelin has no reason to wait for any output. PySpark just adds another problem on top of that - indirect execution. Because of that, even blocking the query won't help you here.
Moreover continuous output from the stream can cause rendering issues and memory problems when browsing the note (it might be possible to use Zeppelin display system via InterpreterContext or REST API, to achieve a bit more sensible behavior, where the output is overwritten or periodically cleared).
A much better choice for testing with Zeppelin is memory sink. This way you can start a query without blocking:
%pyspark
query = (windowedCounts
.writeStream
.outputMode("complete")
.format("memory")
.queryName("some_name")
.start())
and query the result on demand in another paragraph:
%pyspark
spark.table("some_name").show()
It can be coupled with reactive streams or similar solution to provide interval based updates.
It is also possible to use StreamingQueryListener with Py4j callbacks to couple rx with onQueryProgress events, although query listeners are not supported in PySpark, and require a bit of code, to glue things together. Scala interface:
package com.example.spark.observer
import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryListener
import org.apache.spark.sql.streaming.StreamingQueryListener._
trait PythonObserver {
def on_next(o: Object): Unit
}
class PythonStreamingQueryListener(observer: PythonObserver)
extends StreamingQueryListener {
override def onQueryProgress(event: QueryProgressEvent): Unit = {
observer.on_next(event)
}
override def onQueryStarted(event: QueryStartedEvent): Unit = {}
override def onQueryTerminated(event: QueryTerminatedEvent): Unit = {}
}
build a jar, adjusting build definition to reflect desired Scala and Spark version:
scalaVersion := "2.11.8"
val sparkVersion = "2.2.0"
libraryDependencies ++= Seq(
"org.apache.spark" %% "spark-sql" % sparkVersion,
"org.apache.spark" %% "spark-streaming" % sparkVersion
)
put it on the Spark classpath, patch StreamingQueryManager:
%pyspark
from pyspark.sql.streaming import StreamingQueryManager
from pyspark import SparkContext
def addListener(self, listener):
jvm = SparkContext._active_spark_context._jvm
jlistener = jvm.com.example.spark.observer.PythonStreamingQueryListener(
listener
)
self._jsqm.addListener(jlistener)
return jlistener
StreamingQueryManager.addListener = addListener
start callback server:
%pyspark
sc._gateway.start_callback_server()
and add listener:
%pyspark
from rx.subjects import Subject
class StreamingObserver(Subject):
class Java:
implements = ["com.example.spark.observer.PythonObserver"]
observer = StreamingObserver()
spark.streams.addListener(observer)
Finally you can use subscribe and block execution:
%pyspark
(observer
.map(lambda p: p.progress().name())
# .filter() can be used to print only for a specific query
.subscribe(lambda n: spark.table(n).show() if n else None))
input() # Block execution to capture the output
The last step should be executed after you started streaming query.
It is also possible to skip rx and use minimal observer like this:
class StreamingObserver(object):
class Java:
implements = ["com.example.spark.observer.PythonObserver"]
def on_next(self, value):
try:
name = value.progress().name()
if name:
spark.table(name).show()
except: pass
It gives a bit less control than the Subject (one caveat is that this can interfere with other code printing to stdout and can be stopped only by removing listener. With Subject you can easily dispose subscribed observer, once you're done), but otherwise should work more or less the same.
Note that any blocking action will be sufficient to capture the output from the listener and it doesn't have to be executed in the same cell. For example
%pyspark
observer = StreamingObserver()
spark.streams.addListener(observer)
and
%pyspark
import time
time.sleep(42)
would work in a similar way, printing table for a defined time interval.
For completeness you can implement StreamingQueryManager.removeListener.
zeppelin-0.7.3-bin-all uses Spark 2.1.0 (so no rate format to test Structured Streaming with unfortunately).
Make sure that when you start a streaming query with socket source nc -lk 9999 has already been started (as the query simply stops otherwise).
Also make sure that the query is indeed up and running.
val lines = spark
.readStream
.format("socket")
.option("host", "localhost")
.option("port", 9999)
.load
val q = lines.writeStream.format("console").start
It's indeed true that you won't be able to see the output in a Zeppelin notebook possibly because:
Streaming queries start on their own threads (that seems to be outside Zeppelin's reach)
consolesink writes to standard output (usesDataset.showoperator on that separate thread).
All this makes "intercepting" the output not available in Zeppelin.
So we come to answer the real question:
Where is the standard output written to in Zeppelin?
Well, with a very limited understanding of the internals of Zeppelin, I thought it could be logs/zeppelin-interpreter-spark-[hostname].log, but unfortunately could not find the output from the console sink. That's where you can find the logs from Spark (and Structured Streaming in particular) that use log4j but console sink does not use.
It looks as if your only long-term solution were to write your own console-like custom sink and use a log4j logger. Honestly, that is not that hard as it sounds. Follow the sources of console sink.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47357418/how-to-get-the-output-from-console-streaming-sink-in-zeppelin