Why can't I define a new type in ghci?

99封情书 提交于 2019-11-30 07:52:20

titaniumdecoy, I remember being helped with this sort of GHCi mystery when I learned the frequently made point that writing things like 'let square x = x * x' inside the GHCi is like writing let a = f b with do notation in the IO monad -- say in this sort of example:

palindromize :: IO ()
palindromize = do
  a <- readFile "foo.txt"
  let b = reverse a
  putStrLn (a ++ b)

Similarly, when you redefine an expression in the GHCi, it's sort of like doing the following in do notation, which is perfectly legitimate:

makeMess :: IO ()
makeMess = do
   a <- readFile "foo.txt"
   let b = reverse a
   putStrLn (a ++ b)
   let b = a
   putStrLn (a ++ b)

No one would declare a data type in the middle of such a sequence, but would do it elsewhere in the module. I might have guessed that there was some sort of theoretical objection, but Don S.'s remark suggests there isn't one.

Just for historical reference, the HBI Haskell interactive environment allows for full Haskell at the command line, including types, classes and so on. There's no a priori GHCi can't operate similarly, and users could write a front-end to GHC-API that supported this...

ghci does not allow you to define types from interactive input - instead, you need to put your type definition in a file and :load the file into ghci.

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!